REUTERS |

Increased automation and robotics, including A.I., may see humans becoming surplus to requirements for a large number of roles according to studies by Oxford University and Deloitte into the effect of computerisation on future employment.  Oxford’s 2013 study revealed that 47% of total US employment is at risk of being undertaken by machines and its more recent 2014 study with Deloitte found that over the next 2 decades 35% of UK jobs will be at high risk from automation.

Moore’s law states that the amount of computer processing power that you can buy for $1 doubles every 18-24 months and because of this, automisation is now not just a possible option for companies to consider, it is an alternative that can be impossible for some industries to ignore. Continue reading

REUTERS |

The changing world of work

It ought to feel like good news, that the number of jobs being advertised in the online gig economy is on the increase. But somehow it just feels sinister, that there is a growing trend to engage remote workers for piecemeal, short-term or project-based work delivered over the internet (for example, see Amazon Mechanical Turk). Much like the “lots of people love zero hours contracts” line of argument, there are probably those who would say that the way forward is the gig economy, that it is liberating and what we need to free ourselves up from the unimaginative 9 to 5 routine. Continue reading

REUTERS |

All employment practitioners are well aware that there is a very narrow window of time for an employee to present an employment tribunal claim.  In most cases, it needs to be in within three months of the event complained of, subject to the relatively short extension afforded by participation in Acas early conciliation and the tribunal’s discretion to extend time under the just and equitable and not reasonably practicable tests. This, of course, is in marked contrast to the many years a claimant has to decide whether to pursue a claim in the civil courts. Continue reading

REUTERS | Petar Kujundzic

Dressed to distress

Employers need to approach a dress code with great caution, warns Jules Quinn from King & Spalding.

Employers often believe that they can adopt a “one size fits all” approach to their dress code policies.

This year we have already seen employers face reputational or legal challenges on requiring a receptionist to wear high heel shoes, the banning of Muslim head scarfs and burkhas and, most recently, conciliation service ACAS telling employers they are missing out on talent in not employing workers with visible tattoos. Continue reading

REUTERS | David Mdzinarishvili

Following the summer break, discrimination received a lot of government scrutiny and there were several interesting decisions at the EAT.

The EAT held that protecting a disabled employee’s pay can be a reasonable adjustment. Whether it was reasonable for the employer to have taken that step was a separate question. It also found that there was no service provision change where a new contractor takes over a service for their own commercial purposes and confirmed that an early conciliation certificate extends to a claim of constructive dismissal where resignation occurred after certificate was issued.

The Women and Equalities Committee published a report on pregnancy and maternity discrimination, showing that the number of expectant and new mothers forced to leave their jobs has almost doubled since 2005. The Committee made recommendations which the government will respond with “in due course”. The Prime Minister launched an audit of racial disparities in public services, with the first data for this due to be published before summer 2017. The government also announced the intention to consult on caste discrimination. Finally, BEIS House of Commons Select Committee launched an inquiry on corporate governance, focussing on executive pay, directors’ duties and the composition of boardrooms including gender balance. Submissions are requested by 26 October 2016. Continue reading

REUTERS |

Most businesses will send data to the US at some point. As businesses take advantage of the cost-savings and convenience of cloud storage services and HR solutions, transfers of personal data to the US (and more generally outside of the EEA) become increasingly prevalent. This reality has made the recent turmoil over transfers of personal data to the US even more of a critical issue for businesses.

The basics and the background

Personal data is information about people. All HR/staff data is likely to be personal data (unless it is aggregated data or truly anonymised).  Personal data is transferred outside of the EEA if it is “processed” (broadly defined to cover doing practically anything with data) outside of the EEA.  This means that any personal data that is stored on servers in the US or accessible from the US for support/maintenance services has been “transferred” for the purposes of European data protection law.

Continue reading

REUTERS | John Sommers II

Traditionally the quietest month of the year for legal developments, August has nevertheless been busy for employment law news.

The ECJ has held that EU discrimination laws do not protect a job applicant who applies for a job purely seeking compensation. While sham applications in order to bring claims do occasionally occur, they are rare. Employers should be aware of raising any suspicion that an applicant is not genuine unless there is compelling evidence to show otherwise.

There were several interesting decisions at the EAT. It overturned a tribunal’s decision to strike out a whistleblowing claim where there were factual disputes, and held that tribunals have the power to increase injury to feelings awards in line with inflation. More controversially, rule 12(1)(b) of the ET rules, which provides for a claim to be struck out where it is in a form which “cannot sensibly be responded to”, has been held to be ultra vires because it denies the claimant a hearing. Continue reading

REUTERS | Navesh Chitrakar

“Nobody would dispute that protecting children from sexual harm is of the utmost importance, and disclosure is plainly necessary if the risk to children in the school is enhanced. But we are in a dangerous world if mere association with a sex offender warrants that conclusion being drawn.”

Those were the words of Elias LJ, in the minority, in A v B and another [2016] EWCA Civ 766 (paragraph 45). The majority of the Court of Appeal upheld a tribunal’s decision that a headteacher with a successful 23-year career had been fairly dismissed for putting the safety of children at risk. She had failed to disclose her relationship with a man (IS) convicted of making indecent images of children. Continue reading